Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Dec 2017

Tuning, Not Training, the Brain for Sport

PhD and
EdD
Page Range: 73 – 76
DOI: 10.5298/1081-5937-45.4.03
Save
Download PDF

In using neurofeedback with athletes one must consider both the uniqueness of the athlete and the purpose of the training. Our clinical experience suggests that using single hertz frequencies for assessment allows for the fine tuning of the training. For example, rather than training all athletes with alpha (8–12 Hz), you may find that the athlete who typically has high amplitude at 8 Hz needs to be made aware of when the 8 Hz is beneficial during competition but also that it may inhibit intensity and quality of performance during practice. Contrarily, the athlete with typically high amplitude at 12 Hz may be a great ‘practice animal’ but does not perform as well in competition. The ability to identify and change the states needed for different sport purposes is the goal of ‘tuning’ neurofeedback.

Copyright: © Association for Applied Psycholphysiology & Biofeedback
<bold>Figure 1.</bold>
Figure 1.

Higher alpha results from athletes from swimming, tennis, baseball, figure skating biathlon.


<bold>Figure 2.</bold>
Figure 2.

The profile of an athlete who represents 8 Hz dominance.


<bold>Figure 3.</bold>
Figure 3.

Typical profile of a natural 12 Hz athlete.


<bold>Figure 4.</bold>
Figure 4.

Profile of a gifted 10-year-old athlete with 12 Hz dominance complicated by elevated 6–7 Hz and elevated beta readings.


Vietta Wilson


Lindsay Shaw Thorton


Contributor Notes

Correspondence: Vietta Wilson, PhD, 72 University Ave W, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 1N7, email: viettaw@yahoo.com.
  • Download PDF