Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Mar 2016

Train Wrecks and Other Things to Consider

PhD
Page Range: 28 – 34
DOI: 10.5298/1081-5937-44.1.08
Save
Download PDF

All practitioners make mistakes, have lapses in clinical judgment, and have outcomes that do not meet prevailing standards. There are several common minefields that have significant potential for causing train wrecks in therapy. These include missed family dynamics, one-size-fits-all treatment, nonclinical databases, clients with chemicalized brains, inattention to the behavioral/emotional dimension of treatment, and clinician's penchant to hide behind blaming the client for failures. Dogmatic adherence to the notion of pre-eminence of neurofeedback as the singular treatment modality to the exclusion of supportive/adjunctive therapies is particularly hazardous to neurotherapeutic treatment brilliance. However, therapeutic brilliance is likewise dependent on the clinician having expertise in these effective synergetic modalities. Some of the author's train wrecks are presented as case examples.

Copyright: © Association for Applied Psychophysiology & Biofeedback
<bold>Figure 1</bold>
Figure 1

Johnny's ClinicalQ summary. Elevated eyes-closed (EC) theta and alpha slowing pattern suggestive of marijuana use.


<bold>Figure 2</bold>
Figure 2

RateMD ratings (client 4 is heavily medicated).


<bold>Figure 3</bold>
Figure 3

Braindriving heavily medicated client.


<bold>Figure 4</bold>
Figure 4

A child in crisis: ClinicalQ at locations Cz, O1, F3 and F4, and Fz.


Paul G Swingle


Contributor Notes

Correspondence: Paul G. Swingle, Swingle Clinic, 1190 Melville Street, Vancouver, BC V6E 3W1, Canada, email: info@Swingleclinic.com.
  • Download PDF