In preparation for an upcoming AAPB book on Physiological Recording Technology and Applications in Biofeedback and Neurofeedback, the special editors of this issue of Biofeedback recruited authors to address topics never previously addressed with any comprehensiveness in Biofeedback magazine. The result will be two special issues. The present issue includes articles on normative values in general biofeedback, an overall guide to respiratory biofeedback, and a practical discussion on caring for biofeedback and neurofeedback sensors and instruments. In addition, Arnon Rolnick and Yossi Ehrenreich contribute a perspective on the interaction between thereapist and client in
This article provides readers with a guide for evaluating physiological readings during biofeedback assessment and treatment, with the goal of facilitating treatment planning and tracking of treatment progress and outcomes. The author reviews expected values for measurements of breathing, heart rate, heart rate variability, peripheral temperature, and skin conductance.
Professionals can monitor respiration using six biofeedback modalities: strain gauges, surface electromyography, capnometers, oximeters, inspirometers, and feedback thermometers. This article emphasizes the importance of the breathing rhythm, describes how to effectively use each modality, and explains how to minimize contamination by artifacts that masquerade as respiratory activity.
Hagedorn (2014) has highlighted the infection risks in biofeedback and neurofeedback practice and identified broad strategies for mitigating infection risk. In the age of Clostridum difficile, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and human immunodeficiency virus, infection risk cannot be ignored in any health discipline that attaches sensors to patients' skin in most treatments. The present article discusses specific guidelines for care and hygiene of biofeedback and neurofeedback instruments, encoders, cables, and sensors. Attention to practice standards can greatly reduce the risk to practitioner and client alike.
This column focuses on the role of the other in biofeedback and psychophysiological therapy. Our previous paper presented our conviction that an intersubjective point of view that focuses on the interaction between the therapist and the client is very much needed here. In fact, the founders of our field were highly attuned to psychodynamic thinking. Neal Miller, for example, attempted to integrate Freudian concepts into learning processes (Rolnick & Rickles 2010). Adler and Adler (1989), other pioneers in this field, also incorporated the psychodynamic approach to biofeedback.
The AAPB Fellowship Program is a program of earned recognition for AAPB members who are making significant and sustained contributions to the science and practice of applied psychophysiology and biofeedback.
Individuals who earn fellowship may use the designation “Fellow of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback” (AAPB). The names of these individuals will be maintained in the AAPB Registry of Fellows at www.aapb.org and formally recognized at the Annual Scientific Meeting. Additionally, AAPB Fellows receive a physical display certificate (additional fees apply).
The AAPB fellowship program recognizes significant and sustained contribution to advancement of applied psychophysiology and biofeedback through