Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: Jun 01, 2016

Calibrating Respiratory Strain Gauges: What the Numbers Mean for Monitoring Respiration

PhD,
,
PhD,
PhD, and
PhD
Page Range: 101 – 105
Save
Download PDF

How can you be sure that a larger abdominal waveform, as compared with a smaller chest waveform, means that a client is breathing more abdominally than thoracically? Could this difference be due to discrepancies in the sensitivity of the sensors? This article describes a procedure for measuring the sensitivity of respiratory strain gauges and provides practical recommendations for accurate measurement and display of the relative expansion and contraction of the chest and abdomen.

  • Download PDF
Copyright: © Association for Applied Psychophysiology & Biofeedback
<bold>Figure 1</bold>
Figure 1

Location of thoracic and abdominal respiratory strain gauges.


<bold>Figure 2</bold>
Figure 2

One-minute recording of respiration in which the subject breathes more thoracically (indicated by the larger amplitude of the black thoracic tracing and the ratio of the abdominal/thoracic standard deviations: 3.34/4.40 = 0.76).


<bold>Figure 3</bold>
Figure 3

Measuring the stretch of a strain gauge with a ruler.


<bold>Figure 4</bold>
Figure 4

Basic calibration procedure to measure relative units of stretch of respiration strain gauges.


<bold>Figure 5</bold>
Figure 5

Comparison of the sensitivity of respiratory sensors (relative units of stretch/millimeter).


Erik Peper


Grant Groshans


Richard Harvey


Fred Shaffer


Contributor Notes

Correspondence: Erik Peper, PhD, Institute for Holistic Healing Studies/Department of Health Education, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, email: epeper@sfsu.edu, Web: www.biofeedbackhealth.org, blog: www.peperperspective.com.